Stand for dynamic tests of technical products in the mode of amplitudefrequency modulation with hydrostatic vibratory drive
Anatolij Nizhegorodov^{1} , Alexey Gavrilin^{2} , Boris Moyzes^{3} , Ivan Ditenberg^{4} , Olga Zharkevich^{5} , Gulnara Zhetessova^{6} , Oleg Muravyov^{7} , Mikhail Bets^{8}
^{1}Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia
^{2, 3}Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
^{4}Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia
^{5, 6, 7, 8}Karaganda State Technical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
^{5}Corresponding author
Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 18, Issue 6, 2016, p. 37343742.
https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.16994
Received 17 March 2016; received in revised form 9 August 2016; accepted 15 August 2016; published 30 September 2016
JVE Conferences
The article reviews the problems arising during the development of the stand for dynamic tests of technical products in the mode of amplitudefrequency modulation with hydrostatic vibratory drive. It is possible to control the change of the modulating function law and get various spectrograms of the oscillatory process and the oscillation mode with amplitudefrequency modulation, which allows to achieve the maximum effect of vibration tests in the stand.
Keywords: vibration strength, vibrostability, amplitudemodulated vibrations required testing of vibration strength, test stand for dynamic tests of technical products, hydrostatic vibratory drive.
1. Introduction
The negative effect of vibration on the technical devices and the objects of ground transportation and technological devises and equipment (flight computers, pneumatic valves, hydraulic valves, electronic devices, radiorelay devices and other mechanical and electrical devices) is due to the occurrence of resonance phenomena in the devices elements and dynamic loads which causes the failure at standard operation (vibrostability loss) and mechanical failure of the constructional parts (vibration resistance loss) [1, 2].
There is one of the most effective vibration test and vibration resistance test for such products that is a method when oscillation superpositioned with the amplitudefrequency modulation during the process of vibratory and dynamic action amplitude and forcing frequency is changed simultaneously and continuously in a pregiven range [13].
The method provides the simulation of hard harmonic vibratory actions the most often used for road construction, earthmoving and lifting equipment processes. The method can be implemented by electrodynamic vibration exciters with a set of a number of main oscillators of sinusoidal signals [1, 4], synthesizing frequency modulated and spectrally rich variations. These systems are multioperated, but are extremely complex and have a low lifting capacity compared to the hydrostatic vibration stand [1, 2].
The purpose of research is to test the properties of the test stand with hydrostatic excitation of oscillations and the synthesis of oscillations with the amplitudefrequency modulation.
2. Theoretical research
Amplitude modulation (АМ) of harmonic vibrations involves amplitude deformation by modulating function (envelope amplitude) which is the tonal harmonic (Fig. 1) in the simplest case.
In the radio systems an amplitude modulation of harmonic vibration is the carrier of the transmitted signal (message). The same valid signals applied to the vibration test technology. The signal consists of a large number of harmonics, transmitted to the testing device for obtaining feedback in the form of resonances of some of its elements.
The signal with harmonically modulated amplitude can be expressed by a temporal function:
where ${\omega}_{0}$ – carrier frequency, ${\theta}_{0}$ – start phase angle.
The pattern of modulating function $A\left(t\right)$ Eq. (1) defines the set and the size of the synthesized harmonics. In case of tonemodulated signal, being that of shown (Fig. 1):
its amplitude equals to $\mathrm{\Delta}{A}_{m}$.
The ratio equals to:
where ${A}_{0}$ – amplitude average value is called the modulation degree.
Fig. 1. Oscillations modulated by the harmonic function
Thus, the expression:
gives an instantaneous value of modulated oscillation.
For harmonic (tone) modulation, when the envelope is represented by the Eq. (2), the Eq. (3) can be reduced to form [5]:
$\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}\mathrm{}+\mathrm{0,5}k{A}_{0}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\left[\right({\omega}_{0}\u2013\omega )t+({\theta}_{0}\u2013\psi \left)\right].$
The first term on the right side of the expression is the original nonmodulated oscillation with the carrier frequency ${\omega}_{0}$. The second and third terms stand for the new oscillation (harmonic), appear during the amplitude modulation. The frequencies of these oscillations ${\omega}_{0}+\omega $ and ${\omega}_{0}\u2013\omega $ are called the upper and lower side modulation frequencies.
The spectrum of the resulting function Eq. (4) is shown in Fig. 1. The width of the spectrum in this case is equal to doubled frequency modulation 2$\omega $, and the oscillation amplitude of side frequencies cannot exceed a half of the modulated oscillation amplitude (when $k\le $1).
If the modulating function is not tonal and carries a number of harmonics then the spectrum pattern does not change radically but each component of the spectrum gives a pair of side frequencies [5, 6]. As a result, the spectrum is formed. It consists of two bands which are symmetrical about the carrier frequency ${\omega}_{0}$, and the increasing number of harmonics in the spectrum, decreases the value of the modulation degree per each component (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. The AFC spectrum at complex AMfunction
AMoscillation mode synthesizes line spectrum with a high level of carrier energy and side harmonics, but the natural frequencies of the tested product components can be in the intervals between harmonics and natural frequencies and do not produce any resonance reaction. To solve the difficulty and to make tests the most efficient, it is necessary to specify the fluctuation to the carrier frequency in the range which intercepts adjacent frequencies of line spectrum. This process is provided by the amplitudefrequency modulation oscillation regime (Fig. 2). But now the spectrum is continuous, it is characterized by oscillation spectral density and is recognized in coordinate systems $s\left(\omega \right)\u2013\omega \left(\omega \right)$ [5].
The amplitudemodulated oscillation with a complex harmonic composition can be obtained on the test stand with a hydrostatic nonlinear generator of excitation signal (Fig. 3).
The vibration test stand includes a hydrostatic vibration generator, where the elastic shell 1 (high pressure hose HPH) operates as hydraulic liquid displacer. The vibration test stand is provided with a preload shell regulator $h$ on the length of $b$. The shell is connected with a oneway hydraulic cylinder 3, with the plunger pressed to the platform 4 mass $m$, and a springactuated by the restoring spring 5.
The throttles ${t}_{1}$ and ${t}_{2}$ are installed in the hydraulic system of the test stand. The throttles prevent pressure pulsation in a pressure gauge 9 and hydropneumatic accumulator, providing compensation of the leaks in the system. The bleeding hydraulic liquid is air free and is carried out by the valves ${v}_{1}$ and ${v}_{2}$.
The eccentric shaft 6 is connected with the hydraulic motor 7 and when it rotates the hydraulic piston reciprocates fastening and unfastening the shell 1 and displacing an alternating flow of hydraulic liquid into the hydrocylinder 3. In such a way the test platform 4 of the dynamic test stand oscillations are exited.
The law of displacement of the hydraulic liquid from the envelope is described by a quadratic function [7]:
where ${a}_{1}$ and_{}${a}_{2}$_{}– geometrical constants of the shell, equals:
Fig. 3. Basic diagram of the test stand with a hydrostatic nonlinear generator of excitation signal
The parameter $h$ limits variations have structural constraints:
where $d$ and ${d}_{0}$ – outer and inner diameter of the shell, $e$ – generator shaft concentricity.
The dynamic structure of the oscillatory system in question can be represented by the scheme (Fig. 4). Volumetric difference ${w}_{x1}\u2013{w}_{x2}$ forms the deformation volume of the shell cavity $\mathrm{\Delta}w$ that is caused by the dynamic pressure ${P}_{0}\pm P$ in the oscillation circuit “shell – hydrocylinder – test platform”. The dynamic pressure varies nonlinearly, in accordance with the volume elastic characteristic of the shell [7]:
where ${k}_{1}$_{}(N/m^{5}) and ${k}_{2}$_{}(N/m^{8}) – empirical coefficients.
Nonlinear function Eq. (8) leads to the formation of nonlinear elastic connection:
where $f$ – surface area of the hydrocylinder piston, ${c}_{sh}$_{}– volumetric stiffness of the shell which is under initial pressure ${P}_{0}$ at initial volumetric deformation $\mathrm{\Delta}{w}_{0}$, and equals:
The determining factor in the formation of a “soft” amplitudefrequency characteristic (AFC) with a left angle (Fig. 5) is a unidirectional exciting circuit of oscillations, when in the resonant mode the amplitude increases and the test platform with a hydrocylinder plunger detach from the oscillating circuit and the pressure in it falls below up to atmospheric pressure ${P}_{0}$.
In this temporal segment, (“pause” time ${t}_{p}$) the spring stiffness $c$ activates for a short time in the system. So the circuit separated and the position of the switch (circuit selector valve) CSV_{1} – “open” position and CSV_{2} switch – $a$ “closed” correspondingly.
Fig. 4. Block scheme of the test stand with a hydrostatic nonlinear generator of excitation signal
Fig. 5. AFC of the test stand
While rising resonance, the amplitude is increased by $\mathrm{\Delta}A{\left(x\right)}_{2}$ (Fig. 5), then pause time ${t}_{p}$ prolongs and the resonance input in one oscillation period increases too. The average integral value of the stiffness Eq. (9) reduces and the natural frequency of the system equals:
where the coefficients ${c}_{1}$ and ${c}_{2}$_{}equals:
where $m$ – the total weight of the platform and the tested product.
Inherent frequency of the system is indicated in the graphic chart by a dotted “backbone curve”. It is in angle left position. Thus, the inherent frequency of the oscillating circuit ${\omega}_{0}^{*}$ depends on the amplitude and the system has a variable structure (Fig. 4).
If the “backbone curve” is known the amplitude in the resonance ${A}_{{x}_{2}\left(res\right)}$ can be expressed in terms of the quality factor of the system $D$:
where ${A}_{{x}_{2}st}$ – static amplitude at ${\omega}_{1}=$0, equals:
Resonant mode of the amplitude is given by:
where $\xi $ – coefficient of the of relative damping oscillation:
where $\alpha $ – viscous friction coefficient (N·sm/m).
There is ${x}_{1}\left({\omega}_{1}\right)$ – input action or the law of generator piston motion (Fig. 3):
${x}_{2}\left({\omega}_{1}\right)$ – output action (test platform oscillations).
Inherent frequency of the oscillating circuit is moved Eq. (11) in a given frequency range $\mathrm{\Delta}{\omega}_{1}$ (Fig. 5) and is carried out by the initial pressure in the system ${P}_{0}$.
3. Experimental research
Fig. 6 shows the experimental logarithmic amplitudefrequency characteristics (AFC) received on a physical model of the vibration stand with the following design parameters (Fig. 3):
• inner diameter of the shell ${d}_{0}=$0,025 m;
• plungers diameter – 0,02 m (2 pieces);
• other parameters: $b=$0,07 m, $m=$40 kg, $c=$33100 N/m, $h=$0,03…0,036 m, $e=$1,25·10^{3} m.
Fig. 6. Experimental logarithmic amplitudefrequency characteristics of the vibration stand
The character of the logarithmic amplitudefrequency characteristics curves is fully corresponds with the graphic chart shown in Fig. 5.
Dotted lines of the logarithmic amplitudefrequency characteristics indicate the unrealizable areas of the characteristics.
The quality factor of the system is independent of the relative preload $\mathrm{\Delta}=h/{d}_{0}$ and the initial pressure ${P}_{0}$.
So when ${\u0420}_{0}=$ 0,6 MPa, the quality factor is estimated by value 20 ... 20.5 dB, but when ${P}_{0}=$ 2,0 MPa the quality factor is growing to only 20,5 ... 21 dB.
But this is due to:
• moving out of the plunger from the cylinder when the pressure increases;
• reducing the contact area of the cylinder and the plunger;
• reducing the coefficient of viscous friction.
The slope of the highfrequency asymptotes of the logarithmic amplitude frequency characteristics for all values of the initial pressure and the relative preload is approximately 42...45 dB/decade. It is specific for nonlinear systems of the second order and corresponds to the block diagram (Fig. 4).
Experimental logarithmic amplitude frequency characteristics indicate the extra settings possibility for the natural frequency of the oscillating system changing the shell preload $h$.
Due to the “soft” AFC in the oscillating circuit of vibration stand the platform oscillations in the amplitude frequency modulation mode can be obtained [8, 9].
Servomotor of the vibration stand (Fig. 3) serves to control the amount of liquid –$\mathrm{\Delta}w$ and +$\mathrm{\Delta}w$. Servomotor is connected to the mechanical transmission and to the drag link of the swash plate of controlled axial piston pump 8, that provides a change of working volume in the range from ${V}_{1}$ to ${V}_{2}$. This change is equivalent to a change in the feed from ${Q}_{1}$ to ${Q}_{2}$, accordingly, and the angular speed ${\omega}_{1}$ change of hydromotor 7 in the range of ${\omega}_{11}$,…, ${\omega}_{12}$. Thus, the carrier frequency ${\omega}_{1}$ is not a constant.
At a certain sweep velocity of an exciting frequency ${\omega}_{1}$ the modal point $A{\left(x\right)}_{2}$ will move on AFC graphic chart from ${\omega}_{11}$ till ${\omega}_{12}$ with the gradual increase of the oscillations amplitude ${x}_{2}\left(t\right)$. Fig. 7 shows the temporal sweep of the oscillation process, this transition process corresponds to the time ${t}_{12}$ and the amplitude increment $\mathrm{\Delta}{A\left(x\right)}_{2}$ (Fig. 5).
At the point with the angular frequency ${\omega}_{12}$ on the lower branch of the AFC, the system is not stable. The AFC function is discontinuous and the oscillation circuit immediately transforms to another (stable) state corresponding to the resonant mode.
Fig. 7. Oscillations modulated by the jump nonlinear function
Immediately after the transformation, the drive starts to decrease the excitation frequency from ${\omega}_{12}$ to ${\omega}_{11}$, bringing the oscillating circuit to the mode with the maximum amplitude $A{\left(x\right)}_{2max}$. Time ${t}_{21}$ (Fig. 7) and much more increment $\mathrm{\Delta}A{\left(x\right)}_{2}$ (Fig. 5) corresponds to the transformation process.
Thus, the shape of the modulating AM oscillations is determined by the transformation process time ${t}_{12}$ and ${t}_{21}$ and the shape of the AFC system at the segments corresponds to the interval $\mathrm{\Delta}{\omega}_{1}$ (Fig. 5).
By changing the time ${t}_{12}$ and ${t}_{21}$ and the nature of the modal point dynamic at these time intervals (according to the sine law, linear law, etc.) it is possible to control the change of the modulating function law (Fig. 7) and get various spectrograms of the oscillatory process.
As the cyclic transformations from one transformation process ${t}_{12}$ to ${t}_{21}$ and vice versa are accompanied by the change of the carrier frequency excitation ${\omega}_{1}$, then after all we get the oscillation mode with amplitudefrequency modulation, which allows to achieve the maximum effect of vibration tests, realizing the constant oscillatory spectrum with the width $\mathrm{\Delta}{\omega}_{1}$ (Fig. 5). This process is completely identical to the amplitude frequency modulation [18].
4. Conclusions
The AFC spectrum is implemented by means of the hydraulic drive test stand with a nonlinear hydrostatic generator and is an adequate oscillation process that simulates the transport vibration and the vibration of powerunits of land transport and technological machinery and equipment. Therefore, this test stand with hydrostatic excitation of the mechanical oscillations can be used to test various objects for vibrostability and vibration resistance.
References
 Kljuev V. V. Test Engineering. Mashinostroeniye, Moscow, 1982, (in Russian). [Search CrossRef]
 Kljuev V. V. Devices and Systems for Measuring Vibration, Noise and Shock. Book 2. Мashinostroenie, Moscow, 1978, (in Russian). [Search CrossRef]
 Groves R. L., Pipho G. A. Test Stand for Testing Hydraulic Devices. United States Patent 4368638, 1983. [Search CrossRef]
 Wan D. T., Bao Y. W., Tian Y., Liu Z., Qiu Y. Design and application of testing equipment for determining the mechanical properties of ceramics at ultrahigh temperatures. Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 680, 2016, p. 38. [Publisher]
 Solodovnikov V. V. Technique Cybernetics. Аutomatic Control Theory. Mashinostroeniye, Moscow, 1967, (in Russian). [Search CrossRef]
 Goinaraghi F., Kuo В. C. Automatic Control Systems. Wiley Online Library, 2010. [Search CrossRef]
 Nizhegorodov A. I. Hydrovolume vibratory drive of testing stand for amplitudemodulated vibration excitation. Stroitel’nye i Dorozhnye Mashiny, Vol. 5, 2014, p. 3033, (in Russian). [Search CrossRef]
 Nizhegorodov A. I., Gavrilin A. N., Moyzes B. B. Hydrostatic vibratory drive of the test stand for excitation of the amplitudemodulated vibrations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 671, 2016, p. 012037. [Publisher]
 Minorsky N. Nonlinear Oscillation. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1962. [Search CrossRef]
Cited By
PROCEEDINGS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “PROBLEMS OF APPLIED MECHANICS”
A. I. Nizhegorodov, A. N. Gavrilin, B. B. Moyzes, G. I. Odnokopylov, G. M. Ismailov

2021

Anatoliy Nizhegorodov, Aleksey Gavrilin, Boris Moyzes, Georgiy Odnokopylov, G. Izmalov 
2020

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
A I Nizhegorodov, A N Gavrilin, B B Moyzes, K A Kuvshinov

2019

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
I V Plotnikova, L A Redko, N V Chicherina

2019

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
I S Lobanova, V A Meshcheryakov, A N Kalinichenko

2018

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
G V Vavilova, A V Ryumkin

2018

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
I V Plotnikova, N V Chicherina, S S Bays, R G Bildanov, O Stary

2018

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
A I Nizhegorodov, A N Gavrilin, B B Moyzes, A I Cherkasov, O M Zharkevich, G S Zhetessova, N A Savelyeva

2018
